“We must, however, acknowledge, as it seems to me, that man with all his noble qualities, with sympathy which feels for the most debased, with benevolence which extends not only to other men but to the humblest living creature, with his god-like intellect which has penetrated into the movements and constitution of the solar system - with all these exalted powers - Man still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin [Emphasis added]….He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot any longer believe that man is the work of a separate act of creation. He will be forced to admit that the close resemblance of the embryo of man to that, for instance, of a dog - the construction of his skull, limbs and whole frame on the same plan with that of other mammals, independently of the uses to which the parts may be put - the occasional re-appearance of various structures, for instance of several muscles, which man does not normally possess, but which are common to the Quadrumana - and a crowd of analogous facts - all point in the plainest manner to the conclusion that man is the co-descendant with other mammals of a common progenitor.”[Emphasis added].

The WEF explores evolution theory and its tie-in to their favorite subject, climate control, which is really all about “justice and equality”, or at least what they deem them to be. The WEF strongly promotes the effort for global control in order to establish justice and equality. Clearly, they intend to be at the helm of such control over the world. As will be discussed later, we’ll look at the impact of AI and how it may be used in their global pursuit of control.

The antidote to Darwinism comes from such voices as that of Nikole Hannah-Jones, director in The 1619 Project, and highlighted by the Christian Research Institute where she states the 1619 Project,

 “…reimagines America as a ‘slaveocracy’—and says that even Nazi Germany used America as inspiration for its racial policies. But actually Nazi Germany was motivated by Darwinism and its implications. Nazi Germany took eugenics, which was increasingly promoted throughout the West, to its logical conclusion. Namely, to take those that were not well born and exterminate them in order to bring about the uber race. Thus at the heart of the problem is the notion that we’re not created in the image and likeness of God, such that we have intrinsic worth, but rather we are merely molecules in motion—and the goal is always to progress to a higher ideal. The amoeba becomes the ape; and ultimately, the ape becomes the astronaut. For evolution to work, you have to eliminate the weak, otherwise they will pollute the gene pool and render evolutionary progress impossible…”

So one has to wonder if the prevention of a polluted gene pool is one of the drivers behind the WEF’s intention to control global mankind in order to establish and enhance “justice and equality” and how AI could be used to that end.  

That brings us to the AI concept of cyborgs. On the surface, it looks very high tech and attractive. Wasn’t Superman the first cyborg? At any rate, the WEF makes no secret of its push for the time When Humans Become Cyborgs. In their January 24, 2020 forum on the subject, the moderator, Ms. Hiromi Ozaki opened the Davos seminar by gleefully proclaiming she “…always wanted to be a cyborg and is waiting for the day to become one…” and she ended the discussion by stating she wanted to get on ebay to find the brain stimulator that panel member attorney Mr. Lemos talked about. Now that is scary!

The WEF cyborg discussion panel did at least touch upon the issue of ethics and how an ethical framework should be established prior to the development of AI technology. What could be the implications, for instance, when curing treatment crosses over into enhancement? An ethical framework may prevent that. Or, then again, like so many of man’s laws it could be overcome by ego, greed or glory.

It wasn’t mentioned during the forum discussion, but a “bright-line rule”, if you will, for developing technology could at least be established. Unfortunately, the bright-line dictum of “first do no harm” for physicians, pharmacists and other health care providers hasn’t worked out very well for more than two years when it comes to the COVID-19 injurious injections. Therefore, there is not much expectation that such limitation on new technology would work any better. Pandora’s box has been opened and who will or can shut it? The WEF views on the COVID-19 crisis as a tool to attain their Great Reset initiative is telling. Let’s not forget the COVID-19 shots contained AI!      

The real question to this whole idea of AI technology may not be privacy, ownership or security of personal data or the lurking danger of brain hacking. It goes deeper than that because it concerns the nature of man. If the experts in their technological fields deem man to be merely a “hackable animal” in its truest sense then all bets are off, are they not?  

 As horrendous treatment of lab animals continues, the internet is full of testimonials and videos of severely injured people who were treated no differently from those pitiful animals who have been and are being subjected to excruciating and grossly inhumane experimentation. Millions of global citizens have also been subjected to such inhuman experimentation with the FDA unapproved COVID shots and the injured are set adrift by the medical establishment.

To sum up, there are global elites who are hell-bent on remaking the world into what can only be described as a digital prison powered by AI. Even the very idea of a digital prison has its basis on the view of man that globalist power brokers hold. Since they hold man to be nothing more than an animal, we are in for a rocky ride if they are at the ruling helm of a global world government. They apparently don’t know (or care?) that the utopia they are pushing for so stridently doesn’t exist. It can’t exist because it would go against immutable laws of science,

“Entropy is a measure of the disorder in a closed system. According to the second law, entropy in a system almost always increases over time — you can do work to create order in a system, but even the work that's put into reordering increases disorder as a byproduct…Because the measure of entropy is based on probabilities, it is, of course, possible for the entropy to decrease in a system on occasion, but that's statistically very unlikely.”

So this cosmic struggle that man finds himself in leads to one question: to which camp will you align? To the one of science and God’s creation of man with a free will to chose good or evil, or to the one of pseudo-science and AI’s re-creation of man with the loss of his free will?