|
February 9, 2025
It Has Been Over Five Years Since The Guardian Officially Introduced Its Climate Change PsyOp: An In-Depth Look At How it Is Going
By Rhonda Wilson (Expose) -All News Pipeline
More than five and a half years ago,The Guardianupdated its house style guide to introduce terms that more accurately describe the environmental crises facing the world.
Ten years after theClimategate scandalbroke, Damian Carrington,The Guardians environment editor, announced on 17 May 2019 that instead of using climate change, the preferred terms forThe Guardianare climate emergency, crisis, or breakdown and global heating is favored over global warming, although the original terms were not banned.
The house style guideis a guide followed by journalists who write and edit forThe GuardianandObserver.
Commenting on introducing the new language to be used relating to climate change,The Guardians editor-in-chief, Katharine Viner, stated, We want to ensure that we are being scientifically precise, while also communicating clearly with readers on this very important issue. The phrase climate change, for example, sounds rather passive and gentle when what scientists are talking about is a catastrophe for humanity.
This change reflected the urgency of the situation and aimed to better convey the seriousness of global heating,The Guardianclaimed.
The Guardians climate change language introduced in 2019 is not fair, unbiased, objective and neutral journalism that serves as a watchdog on government and those who wish to be in power it is activism, at best.
Psychological operations (PsyOp) or information operations are activities aimed at influencing the motives and objective reasoning of audiences. It involves the use of communication or other means to influence the views, attitudes or behavior of adversaries or civilian populations to achieve an objective.
Whose objective isThe Guardianattempting to achieve? Viner tells us. Increasingly, climate scientists and organizations from the UN to the Met Office are changing their terminology, and using stronger language to describe the situation were in, she said.
You can readThe Guardians articleHERE. To preserve this important and damning evidence ofThe Guardianusing manipulative language to influence its readers views, attitudes and behavior, we have uploaded a copy of the article below.
To this day, this rule for journalists and editors applies. Under climate changeThe Guardians style guide states(emphasis theirs):
climate change
is no longer considered to accurately reflect the seriousness of the overall situation; useclimate emergencyorclimate crisisinstead to describe the broader impact of climate change. However, use climate breakdownorclimate changeorglobal heatingwhen describing it specifically in a scientific or geophysical sense eg Scientists say climate breakdown has led to an increase in the intensity of hurricanes
climate science denierorclimate denier
The OED defines a sceptic as a seeker of the truth; an inquirer who has not yet arrived at definite conclusions.
Most climate sceptics, in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence, deny climate change is happening, or is caused by human activity, so denier is more accurate
ANP EMERGENCY!!-With the passing of Stefan Stanford, ANP's financial situation has become dire.Without significant contributions, the future of All News PipeLine, and our ability to stay online, is in danger. Anything at allANP readers can do to help usishugely appreciated.)
Has The Guardians PysOp paid off?
Five years after introducing its manipulative climate change rhetoric, how successful hasThe Guardians PsyOp been?
Jaime Jessop has compiled a short listof articles published byThe Guardianlinking extremely irritating events (at least, in the opinion ofGuardianjournalists) to the deepening climate crisis breakdown.
Below is Jessops list with a brief description of what the article is about. Comments in [square brackets] are not fromThe Guardians articles; they have been added by us.
Most countries are likely to miss the deadline to submit vital plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions, despite the urgency of the climate crisis.
The UN is urging countries to take time to work harder on their targets, with Simon Stiell, the UNs top climate official, saying that the quality of the plans is more important than meeting the deadline.
The world must cut carbon by about half this decade to have a chance of limiting temperature rises to 1.5C [The Guardianstylizes oC, an abbreviation for degrees Celsius, as C] above preindustrial levels, but current targets are dangerously inadequate, with governments working to blueprints that would result in temperature rises of 2.6C to 2.8C by the end of the century.
Most countries are expected to miss the vital climate deadline as Cop30 [The Guardianstylizes the acronym for Conference of the Parties or COP as Cop] approaches, with many nations unlikely to submit strong Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to cut emissions.
Key countries such as India, the EU, Canada, and Australia are facing challenges in setting ambitious climate targets, while Russia and Saudi Arabia are unlikely to commit to significant cuts.
Experts suggest that even if some countries submit relatively strong NDCs, the global total may not be enough to meet the 1.5C target, but NDCs can be negotiated and updated, and focusing on methane reduction could offer a breathing space to slow down warming.
Staffers from Elon Musks Department of Government Efficiency [The Guardianstylizes the acronym DOGE as Doge] entered the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [The Guardianstylizes the acronym as Noaa rather than NOAA] headquarters, sparking concerns of potential cuts and threats.
The move is seen as part of Project 2025s goal to break up and downsize Noaa, which has been labelled harmful to US prosperity due to its role in climate science.
[Critics argue that NOAAs climate change narrative is driven by delusions and outright lies. They claim that climate science is a sealed universe driven by self-reinforcing faith and sheer fantasy, with no serious reality attached. Critics also point out that NOAA has been less than honest in reporting about billion-dollar disasters, suggesting that the agencys methodology lacks scientific integrity and goes against its own standards. See the article For Govt. And The Media, Delusions And Lies Drive The Climate Change Narrative]
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, has shifted his stance from climate champion to backing Donald Trump, who plans to revoke the electric vehicle (EV) mandate and eliminate a key tax credit for EV buyers.
Musk believes removing EV subsidies will hurt rivals like Ford and General Motors more than Tesla, but experts say Tesla will still be affected, particularly by weakening federal pollution rules.
Musks focus has shifted away from EVs to areas like robotics, AI, and SpaceX, and he has downplayed the dangers of climate change, sparking concerns that he is an opportunist prioritizing personal interests over environmental concerns.
[The Guardianmust be really annoyed with Musk who, in a relatively few words, is destroying their years-long UN climate change PsyOp.]
January 2025 was the warmest January on record, with surface-air temperatures 1.75C [The Guardian stylizes oC, an abbreviation for degrees Celsius, as C] above preindustrial levels, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service.
Climate scientists are surprised by the record temperatures, as they expected a cooling effect from the La Nia weather pattern, but instead, the heat has lingered at record or near-record levels.
Scientists are debating what factors could be driving the high temperatures, with theories including a global shift to cleaner shipping fuels in 2020 which accelerated warming and a reduction in low-lying clouds, but the exact cause remains unclear.
[Cleaner fuels causing warming? That must be giving Guardian journalists nightmares.]
Jeff Bezoss $10bn climate and biodiversity fund has stopped supporting the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), a key climate certification organization.
The halt in funding has raised concerns that US billionaires, including Bezos, are bowing down to Donald Trumps anti-climate action rhetoric.
Researchers and advisers have expressed fears that this decision is part of a broader trend of wealthy individuals moving away from funding climate causes due to Trumps influence.
[As is widely practiced,The Guardianstylizes people as individuals which is part of a broader PsyOp to dehumanize, demote, degrade and demean human beings; to deprive people of theirhuman qualitiessuch as individuality, consciousness, empathy, creativity, resilience and the pursuit of meaning and purpose.]
ANP is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program.ANP EMERGENCY Fundraiser: Dangerous, Derogatory, Harmful, Unreliable! Those are some of the exact words used by Googles censors, aka 'Orwelliancontent police,' in describing many of our controversial stories.Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP.
So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.
All contributionsare greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.
Thank you and God Bless from Susan here on Earth and Stefan from up above.
PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:
Or https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine
Donate Via Snail Mail
Checks or money orders made payable to Susan Duclos can be sent to:
10510 South AvePoland, OH. 44514
Anything at all at Amazon purchased after clickingthis ANP link will allow ANP to make a bit of revenue, all of which will be used to keep ANP online and to keep a roof over our heads. |
