As 66 Million Agree That National Divorce Is Needed, Making The Conservative Case For Separation Of Blue And Red States - Top Homeless And Murder Cities/Counties Are Run By Democrats

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

When thinking of a "National Divorce" the first thought is "secession," and in fact it is the first thing the media associates with calls to separate red states for blue states, as highlighted by an article over at the Daily Mail discussing how 66 million Americans agree with idea by Marjorie Taylor Greene regarding a national divorce.

The Daily Mail states "Secessionist movements are alive and well in Texas and eastern Oregon."

While technically secession is possible, the bar is so high, it isn't likely as the movement would need approval of both houses of Congress and then obtaining ratification by three fourths of the nation's legislatures, according to FindLaw.

Since a quarter of GOP voters are keen on the idea, and only 16% of Democrats favor the idea, the chances of getting both houses of congress and three fourths of the county's legislatures to agree on it, or anything for that matter, is highly unlikely.

With that said, there may be a more feasible plan which we will discuss a little further down in this article.

First the argument on why finding a way to divide red from blue is so much more preferable to Republicans than to Democrats.

MAKING THE CONSERVATIVE CASE FOR A NATIONAL DIVORCE

Each city listed in the chart above has a Democrat Mayor. California "hosts a third of the nation's homeless, half of its street sleepers and SIX of the top 10 of cities worst hit by tent encampments," according to another piece by the Daily Mail.

California has a Democrat governor as well as each of the California cities/counties listed having a Democrat Mayors.

(PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ONLINE: With non-stop censorship, 'big tech' attacks upon independent media, and outside groups spending millions to blacklist conservative news, donations from readers are absolutely critical in keeping All News Pipeline online. So if you like articles like this, please consider donating to ANP.)

According to World Population Review, the top 20 cities with the most murders are as follows:

St. Louis, MO (69.4)

Baltimore, MD (51.1)

New Orleans, LA (40.6)

Detroit, MI (39.7)

Cleveland, OH (33.7)

Las Vegas, NV (31.4)

Kansas City, MO (31.2)

Memphis, TN (27.1)

Newark, NJ (25.6)

Chicago, IL (24)

Cincinnati, OH (23.8)

Philadelphia, PA (20.2)

Milwaukee, WI (20.0)

Tulsa, OK (18.6)

Pittsburgh, PA (18.4)

Indianapolis, IN (17.7)

Louisville, KY (17.5)

Oakland, CA (17.1)

Washington D.C. (17.0)

Atlanta, GA (16.7)

18 of the aforementioned cities are run by Democrat mayors, 1 has a Republican mayor (Tulsa, OK), and one was a Democrat up until 2009 and now is listed as an Independent (Las Vegas, NV).

17 states allow illegal immigrants to obtain driver's licenses, and only one has a Republican governor.

11 states with the most illegal immigrant sanctuaries, and none are run by Republicans. Those states are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.

Is it any wonder that more Republicans favor a national divorce than Democrats?

Now that may change as more red states are passing laws to put limits on abortions. Democrats have made it very clear they favor unlimited abortions, right up until the moment of birth, so more liberals might start favoring the notion of separating red states and blue states.

GREATER IDAHO MOVEMENT COULD BE THE BLUEPRINT WE NEED

As I pointed out above, secession is unlikely given the hoops that have to be jumped through, but the Greater Idaho Movement may end up being a blueprint to success.

Rather than a state wanting to secede from the Union and become separate, this movement proposes moving state lines, which has been done previously.

Below is how it is described on the GreaterIdaho website:

Counties can become a part of Idaho.  State lines have been relocated many times in American history because it just takes an interstate compact between two state legislatures and approval of Congress.

If the United States were governed as a single state, we wouldn’t have the opportunity for state governance to vary according to the culture of a local area. The purpose of having state lines is to allow this variance.  The Oregon/Idaho line was established 163 years ago and is now outdated. It makes no sense in its current location because it doesn’t match the location of the cultural divide in Oregon. The Oregon/Washington line was updated in 1958. It’s time to move other state lines.

This proposal is different from creating a new state because it does not affect the balance of power in the US Senate. This means that it’s more likely to be approved by the Oregon Legislature.

Given the heightened tensions and outright hostility between liberals and conservatives, something that is getting worse, not better, and showing no signs of decreasing, moving state lines so conservatives are part of a more conservative state, and liberals not having to deal with conservatives in liberal states, may be the answer we need.

Zero Hedge counters the leftists' arguments against moving the state line:

This stems from the leftist argument that red counties and states “cannot survive” economically when detached from blue regions. 

It's simply not true.

Firstly, if rural counties are a financial sinkhole for progressive states, then why are they so opposed to rural counties leaving?  Would this not enrich blue counties beyond belief?  While at least one study shows that Idaho would incur expenses such as Medicaid costs, it also shows that the state actually stands to gain an extra $170 million in net revenue with the new counties in place, along with an even greater conservative majority population, all without people being forced to relocate. 

Secondly, if we are talking about economic usefulness, it's important to remember that the majority of people that grow food, produce goods, repair goods and keep the supply chain running are conservative leaning.  Leftists produce very little other than complaints and misery.

BOTTOM LINE

The issue will be getting liberally run states to agree to changing state lines and giving up territory, but with the tensions continuing to rise exponentially, as well as conflicting ideologies about guns, illegal immigration, abortion, taxes, government and a whole host of other issues, that may not be an issue for long.

All donations are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.

Thank you and God Bless. Susan and Stefan.

PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.

One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:



Or https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine

OR Donate With SUBSCRIBESTAR



Donate Via Snail Mail

Checks or money orders made payable to Stefan Stanford or Susan Duclos can be sent to:

P.O. Box 575McHenry, MD. 21541